Apple is not an stranger to lawsuits, women and men company is definitely a relative newcomer into your mobile-phone business, features extended its reach into that space with mobile devices like theiPad. Apple's success makes it significantly larger target, which has a player that must defend its turf. Patents conjure an enormous a component of that.
Now's pretty much as good some time every to accept a simple watch a few Apple's mobile-related patent squabbles over the last many years with companies small and big.
EMG Technology vs. Apple (November 2008)
EMG sued Apple in 2008 for infringing on just the Nexus 4 Leather Case U.S. patent it held covering moving a wireless device screen, combined with zooming. EMG says that applies specifically to Apple's iOS devices, because its associated with navigating Web sites, and applications. The suit originally targeted Apple'siTunes Store, iPhone, iPod Touch andApple TV, with EMG later adding Apple's iPad once this is released.
Outcome: Grow to be determined. The trial date is scheduled for September 12, 2011.
Nokia vs. Apple (2009)
In leading back and forth battles out there, Nokia struck first, accusing Apple of infringing on 10 of patents in relation to wireless devices, and proclaiming that Apple refused to license them. Nokia's claim especially focused technologies allowing devices to plug to GSM, 3G, and Wi-Fi networks. Apple countersued two months later, claiming that Nokia was infringing on 13 of their own patents.
Nokia accompanied by filing a complaint of your U.S. International Trade Commission, nevertheless Apple was infringing on seven of patents. Apple then accused Nokia of infringing on 9 of patents for the U.K.
Outcome: In March, an ITC judge ruled that Apple hasn't been in violation of 5 of Nokia's patents. In the past these companies reached a suggestion, with Apple agreeing paying Nokia google nexus 4 case a licensing fee associated with its patents. As part of the deal, all patent litigation among the two companies is settled.
Eastman Kodak vs. Apple (January 2010)
Eastman Kodak filed a complaint against both Apple and Research in motion sales in January 2010 on the U.S. International Trade Commission, stating that adidas and puma were infringing on top of a digital-imaging patent it owned. Kodak sought to have phones on the two barred from import while in the U.S. Kodak also filed two lawsuits against Apple contained in the U.S., info was specifically created for image preview technology in cellular phones.
Three months after Kodak's lawsuits and ITC complaint, Apple countersued, saying the agency was infringing on a couple of specific to it patents.
Outcome: A January decision with the ITC asserted that Apple and RIM cant be found violating Kodak's patent. Four months later, an ITC administrative judge said Kodak just didn't infringe on Apple's patents. Full committee with the ITC will decide calling uphold or reject that decision on September 19, 2011. With regards to the civil lawsuits concerned with the three companies, they all are ongoing.
Elan Microelectronics vs. Apple (March 2010)
Elan, a Taiwanese chipmaker, sued Apple in March 2010 for violating a patent it owned for "touch-sensitive input devices to be able to detect the simultaneous presence of more than one fingers." Easily put, multi-touch, a sign of Apple's iOS devices ever since the original iPhone, and available during the gadget maker's laptops too. Additionally, the lender sought to build Apple's products barred from import from your U.S. from a section 337 order in the U.S. International Trade Commission.
Outcome: The ITC found Apple to not be in violation of patent infringement at the end of April, a determination Elan seeks in order to get overturned. That review is scheduled to be completed by August 29, 2011. The lawsuit in between two companies within a Northern District of California is set to check out trial in February of still.
Apple vs. HTC (March 2010)
Apple took are designed for HTC at the beginning of March 2010, saying HTC was infringing on 20 of the patents relating to the iPhone's program, hardware, and "underlying architecture." An argument by Apple announcing the law suit had Apple CEO Health-related reasons relating competing products as theft. Apple added a supplementary patent to your suit 90 days later.
Two months after Apple's suit, HTC fired back and nexus 4 bumper case among the liechtenstein, accusing Apple of infringing on five of that patents associated with mobile technology. That also includes patents for software and hardware.
Alongside the suit, Apple filed a complaint along with the ITC, who are looking to bar HTC devices--as well as some from Nokia--from entering the U.S.
Outcome: At the end of April about this year, an ITC staff member said HTC and Nokia ought not to be found liable of infringing on Apple's patents, but that is not the committee-approved decision for the ITC's administrative law judge, that has got yet to be decided. Legal court cases are ongoing.
Motorola vs. Apple (October 2010)
Motorola Mobility attacked Apple in October by having ITC complaint alleging where the iPhone, iPad, ipod itouch, and Apple's Mac computers infringed on 18 of the company's patents. Specially centered were wireless communication technologies like 3G, GPRS, 802.11, and antenna design. Very much like other ITC complaints, Motorola sought to bar Apple products from import directly into U.S., and said Apple refused to license the technology.
Apple responded by filing two lawsuits against Motorola. In those, Apple said Motorola's smartphones were infringing on its patents, specifically touch-screen technologies and user interfaces. Apple broadened that by amending just one of its suits to incorporate 12 additional patents.
Outcome: In November the ITC announced that running barefoot could be investigating complaints from all sides. The related civil suits are ongoing.
Apple vs. Samsung (April 2011)Apple sued Samsung in April, alleging that Samsung had copied its cellular phones at comparison to its graphical user interface and design features. Apple also alleged that Samsung devices showcased infringed on Apple's patents, and caused Samsung undertaking unfair competition. Samsung fired back by launching a wave of patent infringement lawsuits targeting Apple's products in multiple countries.
In a great twist, Samsung's legal team recently asked Apple handy over next-generation versions through the iPhone and iPad to make sure that particular future devices should not be come across exactly the same nexus 4 bumper infringement claims the merchant currently faces while they are Apple's original lawsuit.
The case continues to generate intense interest from tech onlookers. Whilst the two companies compete, Apple and Samsung have historically been close partners, with Apple trying a considerable number of Samsung components all through the array of its devices. Nonetheless, that relationship has not kept Samsung and also it telecommunications group from being targeted.
Outcome: To become determined. The fresh new movement also was the judge recently denying Samsung's request to notice unreleased versions of Apple's products.
See also: Apple patent and trademark skirmishes via the years
No comments:
Post a Comment